{KS} Cog Tools: "Why" Journal Reflection

I work at a school. The “why” should be fairly clear but that is not always the case at a school site. It is, however, at my site. The “why” is the kids. NES is all about creating and fostering learning in students. The “why” is (as cheesy as it sounds) tapping the potential and interest in each individual student so that each of those students has the tools, skills and ability, should they choose, to accomplish whatever goal or dream they have and to ultimately be successful in life. It is not just about students passing tests either. The “why” that drives my organization is the person that student will become. We look at the kid as a whole person, one that will one day have a larger role in society and we want to make sure that the student is equipped to handle challenges, is kind and sees beyond just herself/himself.

Our “why” is central to the larger organizations (the District) activity as well. While it can be mired down by politics and funding, I work in a district that truly seeks to support and foster education.

Over the course of this year, my why has evolved. And, with the help of this program and some probing questions from a friend, my “why” is as follows:

Passionate about deepening educator and student knowledge and critical thinking I strive to expand their world and introduce them to the fundamental truth. Through the vehicles of Educational Leadership, Technological 21st Century Skills, Holocaust Education, Writing and Literature my desire is to awaken them to the individual story and their appreciation of their responsibility as an educator and global citizen.

This is what I want to do with my life. It is what makes me tick, what gets me up each morning, and what directs the choices I make.

Over the course of the last 2 months I have experienced quite a bit of change and that has in turn, heightened my need for personal reflection. A couple of weeks ago I spent some time on my computer writing. It was one of those soul searching, “what am I doing?”, “what is my purpose?” kind of moments. I would not say that I am the eternal optimist, but I love the quote “dwell in possibility” by Emily Dickinson. While my moment of intense reflection a couple weeks ago began out of frustration, fear and what felt like extremely overwhelming decisions, it came to an end with a sense of peace and purpose. Somewhere in my rant I was redirected to my “why” and the idea of dwelling in that possibility.

In many ways my “why” is a more specific and detailed version of my institutions “why”. We both exist to foster and deepen learning. And, while I am ready for some change in my daily work life, I am thankful to be a part of an organization and institution that aligns to and supports my own personal “why”.  As I stated earlier, there are times when policy, budget and state mandates, etc. can be frustrating or annoying. But, ultimately, I spend each day doing what I want to do. I get to support teachers and students. I get to learn, challenge and be challenged. It makes me good at my job, pushes me to improve and inspires me to find new opportunities.  It is a job that allows me to live most days in the “possible”.

{KS} Examining an Action Research Project

Action Research Review

Harmonic Integrations: Methods and Technologies for Conducting Educational Technology Implementations by Joel Lowsky

The problem Lowsky addressed in his AR was: the "underwhelming" educational technology integration into classrooms and curriculum. Specifically, his goal was to see technology used as tool to help teach and improve learning.

Lowsky begins his AR by first examining the problem, defining the role of the technology specialist and then describing the community where the technology integration will be taking place. His research is organized into three different cycles. 

Each cycle is divided into section:

• Introduction 
• Actions Taken
• Desired Outcomes
• Evidence and Analysis

Within each cycle, Lowsky's research and actions are dependent upon 

1. Communication and discussion with the teacher regarding the class session and learning topic.
2. Research to find out what would work best for that class session and learning topic
3. Implementation with the teacher of the research to integrate technology as a tool to improve teaching and learning.

Lowsky's questions guiding his research and subsequent actions were: 

• How can I leverage my continual self-improvement in educational technology integration to support teachers with technology-in-the-curriculum integration goals? 
• What methods can I develop to maximize educational technology integration?

Overall I found Lowsky's AR to be organized in a manner that was easy to follow and read. Much of that however, was due to the organization of his site rather than the material itself. Had I been attempting to extricate this information from his AR paper alone, I would have had more difficulty. Perhaps this could be rectified by further subheadings to further guide the reader.

In regards to his structure and categories, they not only make sense, but as a teacher I also understand the necessity of the steps within each cycle and appreciated the overall structure.

Lowsky's AR is important in the education arena though I felt that it was very specific to his own desired skill set, site and circumstances. That being said, it did address his research questions which made sense given his work environment and job.

Ultimately, I found Lowsky's AR to be an excellent source when looking into the problems surrounding technology integration and the role of the technical specialist. It was clearly well researched and organized well.

{KS} AR Framing

Framing my research problem...I am still struggling a bit with my AR questions but am beginning to feel better about the direction I am headed. As I tackle more of the Literature Review, I am finding more clarity.

Field of Action: Professional Development and Tech Integration at a K-8 Elementary School
Problem: Teachers are feeling frustrated, anxious and overwhelmed when faced with integrating technology into their curriculum and classroom as a learning tool.
Possible Solution: Provide professional development tailored to the individual needs of the staff using Design Thinking principles.
Library search terms: professional development, design thinking, technology integration, motivation to change, differentiation, professional training, engagement, professional learning communities, technology coordinator,
Outcome: A happier staff and classrooms wherein teachers and students are actively utilizing the technology because they are more comfortable and confident.
Research Questions: (a work in progress) Here are the questions I am attempting to answer as I navigate and explore this new world:

1) What questions arise out of my experience to which I would like to search for answers?

• how can I support teachers so that they feel more comfortable?
• how can PD be differentiated to meet the individual needs of the teacher and classroom or grade level?

2) What might be the answers to these questions?

• differentiation
• 1:1 support
• professional goals tied to technology integration
• 
  

3) What do I think might be the underlying causes of the situation for which I have these questions?

• lack of time
• lack of support
• money
• did I mention time?
• the need to do too much in a short period of time
• not applying what is known about how individuals learn to PD and adults
• 
  

4) What alternative answer might exist

• restructure PD
• restructure the classroom

5) Where do I fit into the situation as defined by the questions?

• Technology and Curriculum Coordinator and working with administration and staff to support integration into the classroom

6) What opposition will I encounter?

• time
• attitudes
• money
• support from all parties involved
• resources

7) Where are the sensitive issues?

• change. people are scared, intimidated, opposed, etc to change
• previous experiences have made it so that it is difficult for teachers to 'buy in"
• time constraints
• teachers already feel bogged down by their many and various responsibilities 

8) What are the constraints?

• time 
• money

9) Who needs to be involved?

• myself
• teachers
• administration
• IT?

10) Whose support do I enlist?

• teachers
• administration
• computer lab aide
• ???

{KS} More than ABC & 123

Make a trailer about your learning beliefs.

While I'm not sure if this ended up looking or feeling like a trailer, here are my thoughts.

What I Believe About Learning

On a reflective note, if I were to go about this process again, I would have been more thorough in checking for picture quality and size. My apologies for the blurry images.

{KS} An update to prove I'm still here

I'm behind. Try as I might, I am in the abyss of reading, projecting, working, grading, attempting sleep, and cannot seem to catch up. This is real life. And consequently, the life I agreed to when I signed up for MALT, a program that was clearly very different from the others. One that I am thankful and excited to be a part of everyday.

But I'm behind.

Dewey (who alone one could spend forever and a day processing and mulling over), Smith, action research review, and so on and so forth.

How am I responding?

Quite well actually.

Why?

Perspective. Joy in what I am doing (yes, even when reading Dewey).  And I have a fall break next week.

Worth it? Absolutely.

{KS} AR Logic Model-Staff Development and Design Thinking

{KS} Topic 4: Action Research Ideas

The world of education is overflowing with research. Research that tells us how individuals learn best. Research that speaks to the importance of differentiation, personalization, applied meaning and realistic goals.

The world of Staff Development (SD) or Professional Development (PD) is overflowing with resources. However the majority of it fails to recognize the above research.

Recently I read Change by Design, by Tim Brown and was struck by the applicability of Design Theory to education, specifically SD and PD.

This year, I am working part time in the classroom teaching 8th grade Language Arts and part time as the Technology Coach/Mentor for my school site and district.

Facilitating PD/SD for a staff that I have worked with for 10 years is something I am excited about but am also being very careful about. Historically our staff, like most school staffs out there, have sat through pretty terrible or seemingly meaningless training. I want to avoid that. I want to identify the needs of the staff and plan PD/SD around those needs. This is where Design Theory comes into play. My Action Research will be to apply Design Theory principals to PD/SD.

In turn, it is my hope that teachers will not only have learned something, but will find themselves excited and feel supported as the PD they experience throughout the course of the year will be differentiated, personalized, meaningful and tied to their attainable goals.